You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Auto-generated via `{sandpaper}`
Source : e8eb991
Branch : main
Author : Tim Dennis <[email protected]>
Time : 2025-04-30 21:22:05 +0000
Message : Update index.md
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: index.md
+13-7Lines changed: 13 additions & 7 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -6,6 +6,19 @@ The values proclaimed by open science—trust, transparency, and reproducibility
6
6
7
7
This lesson builds upon work done by the Caltech Library in their Author Carpentry lessons, focusing on how open science values can be integrated into the processes for authoring and reviewing research outputs. Topics include open authoring tools and workflows, contributor roles and transparency, ethics of authorship and review, and the mechanics and culture of open peer review. The lesson concludes by linking open science with Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) values.
8
8
9
+
## Learning Objectives
10
+
11
+
- Demonstrate proficiency in describing various tools and platforms for creating, managing, and sharing open research outputs.
12
+
- Articulate the benefits and challenges of open peer review and understand how to integrate these practices in your own reviewing process.
13
+
- Describe how open authoring reshapes conventional research workflows and understand the implications for research productivity, collaboration, and transparency.
14
+
- Distinguish between open authoring and traditional publishing approaches, understanding their respective advantages and limitations in the context of research dissemination.
15
+
- Understand and be able to discuss the importance of ensuring all contributions are clearly identified and attributed, and that doing so enhances the accuracy and transparency of authorship.
16
+
- Recognize how transparent practices in authoring and reviewing science contribute to better outcomes and foster a more open and accountable research environment.
17
+
18
+
## Narrative Setup
19
+
20
+
An open science loving Author is told that their performance review is reliant on publishing in a “peer-reviewed journal”. They just want to work with their coauthors on GitHub so everything is in a repository with version history and capability for others to collaborate. Let’s learn with them about how the scholarly publishing process works and how they can integrate open science values.
21
+
9
22
::::::::::: prerequisites
10
23
## Prerequisites
11
24
@@ -14,14 +27,7 @@ This lesson builds upon work done by the Caltech Library in their Author Carpent
14
27
-
15
28
:::::::::::::::::::::
16
29
17
-
## Learning Objectives
18
30
19
-
- Demonstrate proficiency in describing various tools and platforms for creating, managing, and sharing open research outputs.
20
-
- Articulate the benefits and challenges of open peer review and understand how to integrate these practices in your own reviewing process.
21
-
- Describe how open authoring reshapes conventional research workflows and understand the implications for research productivity, collaboration, and transparency.
22
-
- Distinguish between open authoring and traditional publishing approaches, understanding their respective advantages and limitations in the context of research dissemination.
23
-
- Understand and be able to discuss the importance of ensuring all contributions are clearly identified and attributed, and that doing so enhances the accuracy and transparency of authorship.
24
-
- Recognize how transparent practices in authoring and reviewing science contribute to better outcomes and foster a more open and accountable research environment.
0 commit comments