Update index.md

Author: jt14den

index.md

@@ -2,7 +2,28 @@
 site: sandpaper::sandpaper_site
 ---
 
-This is a new lesson built with [The Carpentries Workbench][workbench]. 
+# Authoring Open Science
+
+The values proclaimed by open science—trust, transparency, and reproducibility—are most visible during the outputs stage of the research lifecycle. Creating open and transparent outputs is a requirement for reproducible research. Librarians can support researchers in creating these open outputs through education, outreach, technical troubleshooting, and review.
+
+This lesson builds upon work done by the Caltech Library in their Author Carpentry lessons, focusing on how open science values can be integrated into the processes for authoring and reviewing research outputs. Topics include open authoring tools and workflows, contributor roles and transparency, ethics of authorship and review, and the mechanics and culture of open peer review. The lesson concludes by linking open science with Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) values.
+
+::::::::::: prerequisites
+## Prerequisites
+
+- Experience using internet browsers
+- Basic understanding of the scholarly publishing workflow
+- 
+:::::::::::::::::::::
+
+## Learning Objectives
+
+- Demonstrate proficiency in describing various tools and platforms for creating, managing, and sharing open research outputs.
+- Articulate the benefits and challenges of open peer review and understand how to integrate these practices in your own reviewing process.
+- Describe how open authoring reshapes conventional research workflows and understand the implications for research productivity, collaboration, and transparency.
+- Distinguish between open authoring and traditional publishing approaches, understanding their respective advantages and limitations in the context of research dissemination.
+- Understand and be able to discuss the importance of ensuring all contributions are clearly identified and attributed, and that doing so enhances the accuracy and transparency of authorship.
+- Recognize how transparent practices in authoring and reviewing science contribute to better outcomes and foster a more open and accountable research environment.
 
 
 [workbench]: https://carpentries.github.io/sandpaper-docs