-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 593
Use Memcpy in copy_utils #11430
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use Memcpy in copy_utils #11430
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11430
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 35bade4 with merge base d719e8e ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D76061894 |
This PR needs a
|
Summary: standard elementwise copy in copy_utils is inefficient, use memcpy instead Rollback Plan: Differential Revision: D76061894
bbaf3fb
to
2d907bc
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D76061894 |
2d907bc
to
33f6efc
Compare
Summary: standard elementwise copy in copy_utils is inefficient, use memcpy instead Rollback Plan: Differential Revision: D76061894
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D76061894 |
Summary: standard elementwise copy in copy_utils is inefficient, use memcpy instead Rollback Plan: Differential Revision: D76061894
33f6efc
to
cbd6645
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D76061894 |
Summary: standard elementwise copy in copy_utils is inefficient, use memcpy instead Rollback Plan: Differential Revision: D76061894
cbd6645
to
5e1e415
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D76061894 |
1 similar comment
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D76061894 |
5e1e415
to
380bb08
Compare
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#11430 standard elementwise copy in copy_utils is inefficient, use memcpy instead Reviewed By: swolchok Differential Revision: D76061894
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#11430 standard elementwise copy in copy_utils is inefficient, use memcpy instead Reviewed By: swolchok Differential Revision: D76061894
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D76061894 |
380bb08
to
35bade4
Compare
Summary:
standard elementwise copy in copy_utils is inefficient, use memcpy instead
Rollback Plan:
Differential Revision: D76061894