-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
Update README.md - add link_fabric_delete_mode and edge_connections_delete_mode #377
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ The following control variables are available in this collection. | |||
| `force_run_all` | Force all roles in the collection to run | `false` | | |||
| `interface_delete_mode` | Remove interface state as part of the remove role | `false` | | |||
| `inventory_delete_mode` | Remove inventory state as part of the remove role | `false` | | |||
| `link_fabric_delete_mode` | Remove fabric link state as part of the remove role | `false` | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this for intra fabric links and edge connections?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mtarking this is for intra fabric links only. It was added in PR #194 but not updated in all locations.
It's in use in links.yml in remove role: "Manage NDFC Fabric Links" for common and isn remove tasks.
It looks like @mthurstocisco added a new variable for Edge Connections - "edge_connections_delete_mode" in PR #280 . However, it looks like we don't have that in all the docs either. I will update this PR and change the title to include Edge in the docs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@juburnet is there usage implemented everywhere we expect across common and/or different fabric types?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Related Issue(s)
Related Collection Role
Related Data Model Element
Proposed Changes
update readme.md
Test Notes
na
Cisco NDFC Version
na
Checklist