Skip to content

Make InquirerPy module optional #179

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 41 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Make InquirerPy module optional #179

wants to merge 41 commits into from

Conversation

huakim
Copy link

@huakim huakim commented Jul 10, 2024

No description provided.

xuzhen and others added 30 commits January 17, 2024 13:52
This adds a Nix flake to the repo as well as updates the derivation so
that it includes `lzip` as a dependency
1. Refactored function names for better readability and adherence to PEP 8 naming conventions. 2. Addressed several syntax and logical errors in the provided code. 3. Improved code structure and removed redundant code blocks. 4. Ensured consistent use of f-strings for string formatting. 5. Updated imports for better organization and clarity. 6. Resolved issues related to variable usage and scope. 7. Checked and fixed potential runtime errors. 8. Enhanced code comments to improve code documentation. Overall, the changes aim to improve the code's maintainability, readability, and correctness.
Fix the command to get device ID
fixed downloading smartdock
Fix microG Minimal & MinimalIAP installation
Fixes and Code Refactoring
Add Nix flake and improve derivation
Fixed spelling in error messages
- rather than cloning the entire history of repos, can do a shallow clone with a [depth](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-clone#Documentation/git-clone.txt-code--depthcodeemltdepthgtem) of 1
  - this should make it more efficient, particularly when there are many commits or many large commits
  - since the history is unused by regular end users, there is no need to fetch/download it

- could alternatively do a [bare](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-clone#Documentation/git-clone.txt-code--barecode) clone to be even more efficient
  - but I thought a shallow clone is a bit less intrusive for now
    - and is reversible, if needed (i.e. a local shallow clone can fetch the rest of the depth)

- also add syntax highlighting to the first code block, matching the second one
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.