Skip to content

OctoPrint Vulnerable to Denial of Service through malformed HTTP request in OctoPrint

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 10, 2025 in OctoPrint/OctoPrint • Updated Jun 10, 2025

Package

pip OctoPrint (pip)

Affected versions

< 1.11.2

Patched versions

1.11.2

Description

Impact

OctoPrint versions up until and including 1.11.1 contain a vulnerability that allows any unauthenticated attacker to send a manipulated broken multipart/form-data request to OctoPrint and through that make the web server component become unresponsive. This could be used to effectively run a denial of service attack on the OctoPrint server.

Patches

The vulnerability has been patched in version 1.11.2.

Workaround

OctoPrint administrators are once more reminded to not make OctoPrint available on hostile networks (e.g. the internet), regardless of whether this vulnerability is patched or not.

Details

The issue can be triggered by a broken multipart/form-data request lacking an end boundary to any of OctoPrint's endpoints implemented through the octoprint.server.util.tornado.UploadStorageFallbackHandler request handler. The request handler will get stuck in an endless busy loop, looking for a part of the request that will never come. As Tornado is single-threaded, that will effectively block the whole web server.

The fix adds detection of invalid requests like that and ensures they are handled gracefully with an HTTP 400 Bad Request response.

Credits

This vulnerability was discovered and responsibly disclosed to OctoPrint by Jacopo Tediosi.

References

@foosel foosel published to OctoPrint/OctoPrint Jun 10, 2025
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jun 10, 2025
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 10, 2025
Reviewed Jun 10, 2025
Last updated Jun 10, 2025

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Adjacent
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(6th percentile)

CVE ID

CVE-2025-48879

GHSA ID

GHSA-9wj4-8h85-pgrw

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.