newsraft 0.29 (new formula)

[vaygr]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

---

[vaygr]

@chenrui333 is there a way to bypass non-system ncurses library check? This is required on most macOS versions, and there are several similar formulae: lynx, bash, mtm, openvi, trader, sysdig, angband, ncdu, rmw, etc.

[chenrui333]

@chenrui333 is there a way to bypass non-system ncurses library check?

yeah, that error can be ignored. (which only happens for the new formula check)

[p-linnane]

Do we know which versions? If so, we can use uses_from_macos "ncurses", since: :foo. This would allow us to only install brewed ncurses on systems that need it. We also do not need the comment.

[vaygr]

@p-linnane at first I thought Sequoia, but after failed build I looked closely, and it's still lower than required 6.1, so I removed the comment and left it as is.