You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Low-income card trips (n=31334) compared to adult card trips (n=XXXX).
105
+
98
106
**Analyses**
99
107
100
108
Originally, we planned to pursue a multilayer network approach to directly compare the networks of different users, but this quickly became overcomplicated due to the size of the dataset.
@@ -104,5 +112,5 @@ Instead, analyzing each user type network discretely provided more easily interp
104
112
**Limitations**
105
113
106
114
This approach has only been tested with one month of trip data, and even then we ran up against memory and computing limitations to complete the analysis. Additionally, we identified several issues with the data including negative trip times, impossibly long trip times, and trips that had the same start and stop location. These will be addressed in new iterations of the database, but for now were just filtered out.
107
-
How can your work be improved?
115
+
108
116
Running analysis on a more powerful computer would speed up the computation time and enable the use of larger subsets of the data. Additionally, examining how the networks change over time would yield additional valuable insight.
0 commit comments