Skip to content

[FEATURE] Make CONTRIBUTING.md files mention the RFC/RRFC process for new features? #249

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
TysonAndre opened this issue Oct 13, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
content Issues or PRs related to the content of the docs

Comments

@TysonAndre
Copy link

What / Why

New feature requests get opened by new contributors in the issue trackers of npm/cli, etc and closed mentioning that the RRFC process should be used instead. The first place I found the RRFC process mentioned was in the reason for closing feature requests, not in README.md or CONTRIBUTING.md in https://github.com/npm/cli/blob/latest/CONTRIBUTING.md

When

  • n/a

Where

https://github.com/npm/cli/blob/latest/CONTRIBUTING.md
Various other repos in https://github.com/npm/

How

Current Behavior

No mention of RRFC process or what to do to request new features in README.md/CONTRIBUTING.md of npm/cli, and probably other repos.

(Some repos such as https://github.com/npm/npm-registry-fetch#contributing also have a 404 for their link to CONTRIBUTING.md "Contributors guide" https://github.com/npm/npm-registry-fetch/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)

Expected Behavior

Add a section along the lines of:

New Features

New feature requests should be reported in the https://github.com/npm/rfcs/ repo instead of this repo. Please check if a similar feature request has been made already.

Who

  • n/a

References

  • n/a
@TysonAndre TysonAndre changed the title [FEATURE] Make CONTRIBUTING.md files mention the RRFC process for new features? [FEATURE] Make CONTRIBUTING.md files mention the RFC/RRFC process for new features? Oct 13, 2022
@lukekarrys lukekarrys added the content Issues or PRs related to the content of the docs label Oct 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Issues or PRs related to the content of the docs
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants
@lukekarrys @TysonAndre and others