DLVO Potential and Diverging Forces #2044
-
Hello everybody, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
I think that https://azplugins.readthedocs.io/en/stable/module-azplugins-pair.html#hoomd.azplugins.pair.Colloid Here, the meaning of the radii of the particles is where the Lennard-Jones medium is, so the minimum of the potential is a bit larger than the nominal contact distance due to the finite size of the LJ beads that comprise it. You will want to use |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The CUDA_ARCH_LIST variable controls which architectures HOOMD-blue builds for. To silence the many compile warnings issued when CUDA 12.8 builds for architectures that NVIDIA has deprecated, this defaults to hoomd-blue/CMake/hoomd/HOOMDCUDASetup.cmake Lines 5 to 6 in 2e39291 You can configure CMake to build with older architectures:
and then rebuild:
This should work with CUDA 12.8. A future CUDA release is likely to remove support for the deprecated architectures. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I think that
pair.DLVO
might require you to add your own repulsive core to it. Have you considered using an integrated Lennard-Jones potential for the van der Waals attraction in DLVO? It includes both the repulsive core and the attractive tail, and we have implemented this inazplugins
aspair.Colloid
:https://azplugins.readthedocs.io/en/stable/module-azplugins-pair.html#hoomd.azplugins.pair.Colloid
Here, the meaning of the radii of the particles is where the Lennard-Jones medium is, so the minimum of the potential is a bit larger than the nominal contact distance due to the finite size of the LJ beads that comprise it.
You will want to use
pair.Yukawa
with it to get the electrostatic in…