We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wanted to store my language config in seperate lua files and saw that lazy vim does something similar:
return { recommended = function() return LazyVim.extras.wants({ ft = "rust", root = { "Cargo.toml", "rust-project.json" }, }) end, { "Saecki/crates.nvim", event = { "BufRead Cargo.toml" }, opts = { }, } }
However the recommended and the LaztVim.extras.wants are not included lazy.vim
recommended
LaztVim.extras.wants
Can this feature be moved to lazy.nvim?
I tried using ~/.config/nvim/after/ftplugin/{language}.lua as explained by TJ DeVries but this seems only for vim options, not for lazy plugins.
~/.config/nvim/after/ftplugin/{language}.lua
I have it working without the recommended property but i think im missing out on perf improvements, right?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Bump
No branches or pull requests
Did you check the docs?
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Wanted to store my language config in seperate lua files and saw that lazy vim does something similar:
However the
recommended
and theLaztVim.extras.wants
are not included lazy.vimDescribe the solution you'd like
Can this feature be moved to lazy.nvim?
Describe alternatives you've considered
I tried using
~/.config/nvim/after/ftplugin/{language}.lua
as explained by TJ DeVries but this seems only for vim options, not for lazy plugins.I have it working without the
recommended
property but i think im missing out on perf improvements, right?Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: