You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: Toolbox/Libraries/PyTesseract.qmd
+18-16Lines changed: 18 additions & 16 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -32,6 +32,24 @@ Tesseract uses a character-level LSTM model and runs entirely on CPU, making it
32
32
- Outputs plain text, bounding boxes, PDFs, TSV, and XML formats
33
33
- Fast CPU-based inference with no GPU dependencies
34
34
35
+
## When to use
36
+
37
+
- You need fast OCR on clean documents or small image batches
38
+
- You want to automate extraction from scanned forms, labels, or tables
39
+
- You're working in a CPU-only or resource-constrained environment
40
+
- You want a scriptable fallback tool before reaching for ViT-based OCR
41
+
42
+
## Pros and limitations
43
+
44
+
| Pros | Limitations |
45
+
|------|-------------|
46
+
| Easy to install and use on most systems | No GPU acceleration — slower on large datasets |
47
+
| Multilingual out of the box | Cannot be fine-tuned or retrained |
48
+
| Good for simple forms and documents | Struggles with complex layouts or visual context |
49
+
| CPU-only — works in low-resource environments | Lower accuracy than transformer-based models on cluttered or noisy inputs |
50
+
51
+
Tesseract's fast CPU performance and no-frills setup make it great for small-scale OCR, but it's not optimized for high-volume pipelines or scene text recognition.
52
+
35
53
## Model architecture
36
54
37
55
Tesseract relies on an LSTM pipeline trained on character-level text. It performs well when the input is clean and straightforward — such as scanned documents or forms — but struggles with visual ambiguity, clutter, or layout-sensitive content.
Replace `"example.png"` with your own image file containing text. Pytesseract supports both in-memory images and file paths.
97
115
98
-
## Pros and limitations
99
-
100
-
| Pros | Limitations |
101
-
|------|-------------|
102
-
| Easy to install and use on most systems | No GPU acceleration — slower on large datasets |
103
-
| Multilingual out of the box | Cannot be fine-tuned or retrained |
104
-
| Good for simple forms and documents | Struggles with complex layouts or visual context |
105
-
| CPU-only — works in low-resource environments | Lower accuracy than transformer-based models on cluttered or noisy inputs |
106
116
107
-
Tesseract's fast CPU performance and no-frills setup make it great for small-scale OCR, but it's not optimized for high-volume pipelines or scene text recognition.
108
-
109
-
## When to use
110
-
111
-
- You need fast OCR on clean documents or small image batches
112
-
- You want to automate extraction from scanned forms, labels, or tables
113
-
- You're working in a CPU-only or resource-constrained environment
114
-
- You want a scriptable fallback tool before reaching for ViT-based OCR
0 commit comments