Replies: 1 comment
-
Yes, this sentence can be stated in a more rigorous way. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello, first thank you for this work!
Sorry if I misunderstood something, but in proof box 2.1 of page 39, it is stated that:
This would be true if were an elementwise exponent, but it appears to be a matrix exponent. For instance:
(Which is of course not a proper stochastic matrix), satisfies the "every entry is nonnegative and no greater than one" condition, but:
Clearly does not satisfy .
Shouldn't the argument be based on being a stochastic matrix with a spectral radius of one instead ?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions