-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
Center camera on annotation #2132
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
roboflow labeling features[centered cross guideline ] aliked will greatly increase labeling product abilities :-) |
Is this feature, or any similar feature, planned for any upcoming sprint? Would be really nice to have! |
Hi @RasmusJohns we currently don't have this feature request in an upcoming sprint, but I'll definitely add this request to our product backlog as I can see how this would be useful to many folks. |
This seems to be one of the most common feature requests. Any update on hopes of being included in the future? |
I think I am facing a similar problem, when using LabelStudio to label timeSeries data with preannotated labels. |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In our use case, we have about 600 labels and 100 annotations per high-res image. Verifying the correctness of these annotations can be very tedious, as you have two options:
Describe the solution you'd like
I think the solution should be to have a hotkey that centers the camera around a bounding box, zooming in enough to make the label readable. Then, you could simply click a region in the sidebar, smash your hotkey and quickly verify if the bounding box contains the correct label.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Alternatively, there could be a hotkey that just toggles between each bounding box and zooms in on them. This has the advantage of using only the keyboard. However, some times you don't want to toggle between 99 annotations before reaching the one you actually wanted to see.
Maybe the best solution is to implement both? The two solutions will probably share a lot of code.
Additional context
Nothing to add. Happy to answer questions or discuss it further.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: